|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Quick links
Hairy
World -- BitTorrent users per city map of the world
| Rationale |
 |
 |
| why and how is this work
relevant? |
 |
| Peer-to-Peer systems
like BitTorrent have recently attracted the interest of the
Internet audience with their ability to share content at high
speeds, while lowering the burden on the initial data owner.
Besides optimizing the transfers, researchers are focusing on
robustness and fault tolerance, issues inextricably linked with
the location and activity of the network users. In this study
we present a peer-level analysis of a large set of BitTorrent
measurements and the correlation of three views on the location,
time patterns and users activity. We present evidence that BitTorrent
content presents non-trivial locality features and show that
exploiting these features could greatly benefit the world of
P2P systems, and in particular BitTorrent. |
| A
Personal Introduction... |
 |
 |
| how did I get into this? |
 |
| I was attending the ASCI
A9 course and was due to make a small report. The subject was
supposed to be in the area of P2P systems -- distributed
systems in which nodes (which normally play equal roles, being
therefore called peers) employ distributed resources to perform
a critical function in a decentralized fashion [6]
-- and, since I was interested in the P2P file-sharing systems,
and was given the opportunity and much needed assistance, I've
started working on the analysis of a large BitTorrent
trace, aka The Delft Bittorrent
Dataset. The trace and much help have been kindly provided
by Drd.Pawel Garbacki
and Dr.Johan
Pouwelse. Many thanks! |
| Some
results |
 |
 |
| mostly pics and graphs,
taken from the publications... |
 |
|
|
| Research |
 |
 |
| what did we do, after all? |
 |
Three important lessons
surface from our study. The most important lesson is that BitTorrent
shared contents displays various levels of locality, both trivial
and non-trivial. The most obvious types of locality are the
communities of users speaking the same language sharing localized
versions of some data. The non-trivial examples include the
preference of some countries for particular categories of contents
(e.g. Hong Kong downloading a soccer management simulator, possibly
because of the growing soccer gambling addiction [2])
and the presence of single ISPs that serve over 50% of some
media's users. The second lesson is that BitTorrent users are
strongly influenced by the presence of alias media---the
same contents presented under different names and/or languages.
The final lesson is that global views over P2P networks do not
yield conclusive characterizations of the network under survey;
instead, detailed views organized per categories of files and
alias media should be used.
In addition to the three lessons, this study shows that BitTorrent
exhibits a number of distinctive features. First, Europe, and
not North America, is the most important contributor to BitTorrent's
traffic. Second, the percentage of users per continent, country,
or organization (from the total number of observed users) is
very close to the percentage of their weight (from the total
observed weight). Third, the highest number of users can be
actually seen during the during Europe's slow work hours,
and not only during diurnal and nocturnal hours. Fourth, the
total number of chunks available in the BitTorrent is sometimes
very low, usually due to web sites failures. Fifth, the probability
of a node having or downloading a certain number of files decreases
supra-exponentially with the number of files. Sixth, users starting
to download a number of files usually finish downloading that
number of files or the equivalent. Finally, the majority of
the BitTorrent users drop just before obtaining at least
one complete file.
|
| Publications,
conferences, talks |
 |
 |
| validating our
work... |
 |
|
|
A.Iosup,P.Garbacki,J.A.Pouwelse,D.H.J.Epema,
Analyzing BitTorrent: Three Lessons from One Peer-Level View,
ASCI'2005, 6-8 June, Heijen, The Netherlands (accepted).
article ![Article, PDF [330KB]](icos/icopdf.gif)
|
 |
|
|
A.Iosup,
Where in the world is Carmen BitDiego? And who is she, anyways...,
ASCI A9 Report, February 2005.
report ![Article, PDF [140KB]](icos/icopdf.gif)
|
 |
|
|
A.Iosup,
Where in the world is Carmen BitDiego? And who is she, anyways...,
Presented at The 12th annual ASCI Computing Workshop (GNARP)
2005, February 2005, Garderen, The Netherlands.
presentation ![Presentation, PPT [7MB]](icos/icoppt.gif)
venue GNARP
Workshop 2005. |
 |
| References |
 |
 |
| these studies have enabled
us to work on this project |
 |
- K. P. Gummadi, R. J. Dunn, S. Saroiu, S. D. Gribble,
H. M. Levy, and J. Zahorjan. Measurement, modeling, and
analysis of a peer-to-peer file-sharing workload. In
SOSP ’03: Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM symposium on
Operating systems principles, pages 314–329. ACM Press,
2003.
- Hong Kong Govt. Gambling review: A
consultation paper, Jul 2001. http://www.info.gov.hk/archive/consult/2001/gambling-e.pdf.
- M. Izal, G. Urvoy-Keller, E. Biersack, P. Felber, A.
Al Hamra, and L. Garces-Erice. Dissecting BitTorrent:
Five months in a torrent’s lifetime. In Passive and
Active Measurements (PAM 2004), April 2004.
- T. Karagiannis, A. Broido, N. Brownlee, k. claffy, and
M. Faloutsos. Is P2P dying or just hiding?. In Global
Internet and Next Generation Networks (Globecom 2004), Dallas,
Texas, US, Dec 2004.
- N. Leibowitz, M. Ripeanu, and A.Wierzbicki. Deconstructing
the Kazaa Network. In Proceedings of The Third IEEE
Workshop on Internet Applications, page 112, June 23-24
2003. San Jose, California.
- X. Li and J. Wu, Searching Techniques
in Peer-to-Peer Networks, to appear in Handbook of Theoretical
and Algorithmic Aspects of Ad Hoc, Sensor, and Peer-to-Peer
Networks, J. Wu (ed.), CRC Press, 2005.
- A. Parker. The true picture of peer-to-peer file-sharing.
CacheLogic Presentation, July 2004.
- J. Pouwelse, P. Garbacki, D. Epema, and H. Sips. The
Bit-Torrent p2p file-sharing system: Measurements and analysis.
In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Peer-To-Peer
Systems (IPTPS’05), Ithaca, New York, USA, February 2005.
- S. Saroiu, P. Gummadi, and S. Gribble. A measurement
study of peer-to-peer file sharing systems. In Proceedings
of Multimedia Computing and Networking, 2002.
- R. Schollmeier and G. Kunzmann. GnuViz - Mapping the
Gnutella Networks to its Geographical Locations. Praxis
der Informationsverarbeitung und Kommunikation (PIK), 26(2):74–79,
2003.
- S. Sen and J. Wong. Analyzing peer-to-peer traffic
across large networks. In Second Annual ACM Internet
Measurement Workshop, November 2002.
- D. Zeinalipour-Yazti and T. Folias. A quantitative
analysis of the gnutella network traffic. Course Project
for Advanced Topics in Networks, with M. Faloutsos at the
University of California - Riverside, Dpt. of CS, April
2002.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|